Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05768
Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05768

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 
(FY11) be restored.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was unable to take use or leave he scheduled due to a short 
notice deployment.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of major (O-4).

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice.  According to Master Military Pay Account 
(MMPA), the applicant had 70 days of accrued leave at the 
beginning of FY 11.  He earned 30 days of leave and used 12 days 
leaving a balance of 93 days of leave at the end of FY 11.

In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3003, Military 
Leave Program, service members are not authorized Special Leave 
Accrual (SLA) who were precluded from using leave by a normal 
permanent change of station (PCS), temporary duty (TDY), 
training exercises, attending schools or courses, and research 
requirements.  

Service members who submit a request to recover lost leave must 
clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force 
caused the lost leave.  Unit Commanders are required to advise 
service members who schedule use or lose leave near the end of 
the fiscal year they are at risk of losing leave on 1 October if 
military requirements or personal circumstances prevented them 
taking leave.  The applicant failed to schedule leave within the 
operational requirements.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 25 Apr 13, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We note the 
comments of the office of primary responsibility (OPR) 
indicating there is no evidence to indicate the applicant lost 
his leave due to an error on the part of the Air Force;  
however, after a thorough review of the documentation provided, 
we believe the evidence provided is sufficient to conclude that 
operational requirements, which caused the applicant to be away 
from his home station on temporary duty for more than eight 
months, precluded him from being able to avoid losing his leave.  
Therefore, to preclude an injustice to the applicant, we 
recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that 
thirteen (13) days of leave were restored to his leave balance.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05768 in Executive Session on 7 Oct 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Nov 12, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 18 Apr 13.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05768

    Original file (BC 2012 05768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05768 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirteen days of leave he lost at the end of Fiscal Year 2011 (FY11) be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726

    Original file (BC-2012-05726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states “members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs.” AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., “unit commanders: advise members who schedule “use or lose” leave in August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01027

    Original file (BC-2012-01027.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01027 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Eight (8) days of leave be restored to his leave account. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00821

    Original file (BC 2014 00821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    “ Scheduling leave prevents loss of leave at fiscal year (FY)-end balancing, retirement, or separation from active duty. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends the 16 lost days were due to being penalized as reprisal for speaking out against her commander at the time; he allegedly committed sexual assault against her. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include her rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01018

    Original file (BC 2014 01018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He filed an appeal through the comptroller squadron which was denied stating that he was only authorized to carry over 75 days of accrued leave for the fiscal year. Member’s failure to use leave, as accruing can result in loss of accrued leave at FY-end leave balancing or upon retirement or separation from active duty.” When the applicant did not use his 10 days of annual leave prior to retiring, he forfeited those days. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00768

    Original file (BC 2014 00768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he had known he would be losing six days of leave then he would have made adjustments to his PTDY and terminal leave dates. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not use six days of his annual/ordinary leave...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03925

    Original file (BC-2011-03925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This extension was completed, signed, and approved in Mar 2009; however, the local personnel office said they could not update the system until 1 Dec 2009, which was the first day of her extension. In this regard, we note that DPSIM initially recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request; however, after reviewing the extension paperwork, DPSIM now recommends 17.5 days of leave be restored to her leave account and we agree. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01854

    Original file (BC 2014 01854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the information provided, there was no error or injustice caused by the Air Force which would have prevented the applicant from using the 10.5 days of lost leave. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 August 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302

    Original file (BC-2012-01302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001

    Original file (BC 2013 01001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...